Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WEB-2243] fix: active cycle info icon overlap #5428

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

sharma01ketan
Copy link
Collaborator

@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan commented Aug 26, 2024

Changes:

This PR fixes the overlapping of info icon with the above component which appears while hovering over the current active cycle

Current State
Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 6 13 21 PM

Previous State
Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 6 12 47 PM

Reference:

[WEB-2243]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted the z-index of the button in the Cycles List Item component to improve visibility and interaction, especially in overlapping scenarios.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifying the CyclesListItem component by adjusting the className property of a button element. Specifically, the z-index value is updated from 5 to 1, impacting the button's stacking order relative to other elements on the page. No changes are made to the declarations of exported or public entities.

Changes

Files Change Summary
web/core/components/cycles/list/cycles-list-item.tsx Updated z-index of button from 5 to 1.

Poem

In the meadow where buttons play,
A little change brightens the day.
From five to one, they shift and sway,
Layered nicely, they dance away! 🐇✨
Hopping high, they find their way,
A playful tune, come join the fray!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4689ebe and 6704f30.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/cycles/list/cycles-list-item.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • web/core/components/cycles/list/cycles-list-item.tsx

@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan self-assigned this Aug 26, 2024
@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan added 🐛bug Something isn't working 🌐frontend labels Aug 26, 2024
@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan added this to the v0.23-dev milestone Aug 26, 2024
@SatishGandham SatishGandham merged commit 08c9bd7 into preview Aug 27, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@SatishGandham SatishGandham deleted the fix/active-cycle-info-icon-overlap branch August 27, 2024 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐛bug Something isn't working 🌐frontend
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants